Journalists go to sleep counting penguins
When a leading journal publishes a mathematical error, how many journalists spot it? Very few, to judge from a recent slip by Nature.
Nigel Hawkes :: Thu 7th Jun 2012
Sheila Bird :: Fri 1st Jun 2012
Peterborough Prison: can matching ride to the rescue of a non-randomized study?
Full Fact :: Fri 1st Jun 2012
Did Labour 'fix the figures' on unemployment while in office?
Nigel Hawkes :: Thu 31st May 2012
Nigel Hawkes :: Tue 15th May 2012
Full Fact :: Thu 10th May 2012
Heathrow queues report exposes need for better immigration data
Fri 10th Dec 2010
Thu 5th Aug 2010
Wed 26th May 2010
When a leading journal publishes a mathematical error, how many journalists spot it? Very few, to judge from a recent slip by Nature.
Scientists from the US are the most prone to dishonesty, claims a new paper (1) in the Journal of Medical Ethics.
The British system really does treat electors like idiots.
A new report calls for better training for journalists who write about science, especially in the understanding of statistics.
There are big gaps in UK data on swine flu, many of them because so few virological confirmations of H1N1 seem to be being undertaken anywhere. But virology matters - and if more tests had been done, we might begin to understand why the number of people in hospital for swine flu in England is so much greater than in Scotland.
Pity poor Darwin. So many people are using his bicentenary as a grindstone on which to hone their prejudices.