A lot of science is just plain wrong
Suddenly, everybody’s saying it: the scientific and medical literature is riddled with poor studies, irreproducible results, concealed data and sloppy mistakes.
Nigel Hawkes :: Thu 7th Jun 2012
Sheila Bird :: Fri 1st Jun 2012
Peterborough Prison: can matching ride to the rescue of a non-randomized study?
Full Fact :: Fri 1st Jun 2012
Did Labour 'fix the figures' on unemployment while in office?
Nigel Hawkes :: Thu 31st May 2012
Nigel Hawkes :: Tue 15th May 2012
Full Fact :: Thu 10th May 2012
Heathrow queues report exposes need for better immigration data
Fri 10th Dec 2010
Thu 5th Aug 2010
Wed 26th May 2010
Suddenly, everybody’s saying it: the scientific and medical literature is riddled with poor studies, irreproducible results, concealed data and sloppy mistakes.
On March 25, The Times published an article headlined “Schools struggle with attention disorder ‘avalanche’”.
In 2008, the then-Government launched a research project called “Amplifying the voice of Muslim students”
Have you ever wondered about the rising popularity of a word?
Scientists from the US are the most prone to dishonesty, claims a new paper (1) in the Journal of Medical Ethics.
Earlier this month, lots of media attention was paid to a new analysis concluding that giving birth at home tripled the chances of the baby dying.
The coroner who held the inquests into the victims of Harold Shipman has said that all deaths of babies in hospital should be reported to the local coroner.
The British system really does treat electors like idiots.